The uniform pension fund regulations are not uniform for all, or perhaps the relationship between the uniform regulations of the pension funds that came into force on June 1, 1818, and between coverage and disability, is a lot more important than ever before. The uniform pension fund regulations are already in effect from June 1,
So far, each pension fund had its own rules, and although all the regulations were quite similar, there have been still differences between them. Moreover, the various insurance tracks in each pension fund could confuse any reasonable person, from the different names given by each pension fund to the same insurance track, and by the variety of insurance tracks in each pension fund.
The goal of uniformity of the regulations is actually a superior goal on the one hand, since the here will be able to choose his pension fund in accordance with accessible parameters such as: yields in different time ranges, management fees, service and size of the fund.
On the other hand, uniformity results in a long-term financial product which is a shelf product, and there is no ability for any pension fund to initiate problems that benefit members in a few creative way.
The amount of the member’s insurance policy for disability and survivors is determined by three parameters: Era of seniority in the member – age admission later means a lesser percentage of coverage; The insured wage from where the allowances are produced from the insurance coverage coverage; The insurance policy track chosen from the member.
With the insurance track, it really is easy to figure out how the monthly deposit will likely be divided between purchasing insurance coverages and the increase in savings. The more money will likely be diverted to the purchase of insurance policy, the greater the insurance policy it will acquire.
This can be so that you can give flexibility to the member, who would like to purchase insurance for disability and survivors, whose cost affects the savings at the conclusion of the period. Contrary to the options that existed before, the typical regulations will have only 7 tracks.
The insurance policy coverage rates will decrease the coverage received by members who join the very first time in an older age
Moreover, the fundamental change that will be within the uniform policies is the price of coverage for lack of capability to work.
After the Ministry of Finance instructed the pension funds to decrease insurance coverage costs in 2013, it was now decided to boost the cost again . With all the gaps moving around 2x, depending on the se.x from the member, and also at age enrollment.
The result of the increase in tariffs would be that the joining of any man from age of 42 north to a pension fund is not going to buy him maximum coverage for disability and survivors.
As an example – A member who joins at age of 30 in a salary of ten thousand NIS chooses the highest coverage for disability and survivors, a 75% disability track , and 100% survivors (except for those over the age of 41) is going to be eligible for a disability pension of NIS 7,500 and a survivors’ pension of NIS ten thousand. The old age pension at age 67 on the basis of the savings will be NIS 9,299. If he chooses a track which includes a minimum insurance, such as: 37.5% disability, 40% survivors, svejpi receive an allowance of NIS 9,719.
Let’s assume that the identical member joins the very first time at age of 48, and even then wants maximum insurance coverage. The coverage for your disability is going to be only NIS 3,750, and also the coverage for the survivors will likely be NIS 9,200.
What will the colleague do? He would like the business to get insurance for him that is certainly complementary to the insurance company, in order that he will provide him the supplement for your coverage. Quite simply, the business will buy a cover of NIS 3,750 in a separate insurance policy for loss of work capacity, to ensure that he will likely be insured using a full cover of 75%.
At the moment it has stopped being possible to purchase supplementary supplements for separate policies. Currently, this has been common among the working population, that the employer has acquired to them “plant ownership incapacity.” This coverage provided a solution both to the insured’s salary in managers’ insurance as well as the insured’s salary inside the pension fund.